Case Summary
M/s. Handy Man Events And Production filed a suit against Event Management Association Kerala and its officials. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and failure to pay the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent without representation and failed to pay the requisite court fee, resulting in the suit being rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and failed to pay the balance court fee.
The plaintiff was continuously absent and failed to pay the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and failed to pay the balance court fee.
The plaintiff was continuously absent and failed to pay the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was continuously absent and failed to pay the balance court fee.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 14th day of November, 2025).
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Handy Man Events And Production
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o. Rajeev V
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Event Management Association Kerala (EMAK)
- Relation
- Represented by its President Raju Kannampuzha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju Kannampuzha
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o. not known
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gincy Thomas
- Relation
- General Secretary, EMAK
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bahanan K. Areeckal
- Relation
- Treasurer, EMAK
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun Gopalakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Avinash Kalyana Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. S Arunkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Devaraj Subramanian
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jerin Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amrutha P.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid and plaintiff is continuously absent without representation. Suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Handy Man Events And Production vs Event Management Association Kerala et al regarding suit rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Handy Man Events And Production vs Event Management Association Kerala et al regarding suit rejection.