Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 329 of 2020

Case between M/s. Group Mukkadan vs Mr. Gijo George regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-02-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Group Mukkadan filed a suit against Mr. Gijo George. Both parties were absent during the hearing, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendant.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Group Mukkadan
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Thomas Chacko
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Gijo George
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Babu Karukapadath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M Faizal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Stiya Sivan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shelly Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Uma.V.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.U Vinod Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Avinash.P.Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joju Kynady
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tom Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abdul Nabeel.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both plaintiff and defendant.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Group Mukkadan vs Mr. Gijo George regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Group Mukkadan vs Mr. Gijo George regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won