Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 696/2025

Case between M/s Emir Agro Industries Private Limited vs The Authorised Officer, Bajaj Finance Limited regarding interim injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Emir Agro Industries Private Limited filed a petition for an interim injunction against The Authorised Officer, Bajaj Finance Limited to prevent the forcible possession of a vehicle. The court found sufficient grounds to issue the injunction to avoid irreparable injury to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction to the petitioner, preventing the respondent from taking possession of the vehicle until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining forcible possession of vehicle KL 07-CV-8002
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction to the petitioner, preventing the respondent from taking possession of the vehicle until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case, and irreparable injury was likely if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent from taking forcible possession of vehicle bearing no. KL 07-CV-8002 otherwise than in the due course of law until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Emir Agro Industries Private Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Authorised Officer, Bajaj Finance Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M K Aboobacker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D M Noufal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fousiya Rayinmakki
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Philip T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Achu Shuba Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neha Susan Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rineesha Rajkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kallyani G Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Urmila M G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amala Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Yamin Mohammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the respondents from taking possession of the vehicle.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent from taking forcible possession of vehicle bearing no. KL 07-CV-8002 otherwise than in the due course of law until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Emir Agro Industries Private Limited vs The Authorised Officer, Bajaj Finance Limited regarding interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Emir Agro Industries Private Limited vs The Authorised Officer, Bajaj Finance Limited regarding interim injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won