Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1327/2018

Case between M/s. Dynamic Architectural Hardware vs Itty M. regarding recovery of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-04
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Dynamic Architectural Hardware is suing Itty M. for recovery of an outstanding balance from hardware purchases. The plaintiff claims the defendant owes ₹68,078 due to unpaid invoices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to pay ₹68,078 along with interest and costs to the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s claims were substantiated by sufficient evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay ₹68,078 and costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the outstanding balance through ledger accounts and invoices.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹68,078 and 9% interest from date of suit till date of decree, and thereafter till the date of recovery at the rate of 6% interest. Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Dynamic Architectural Hardware (Age not specified years) No.33/2159­A1, Issac Towers, Opposite spices Board, N.H. Bypass, Vennala P.O., Kochi­682028. Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Itty M. (Age not specified years) Maliekkal House, Hill Gardens, Kangarappady, Thrikkakkara P.O., Kochi­682021.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of 68,078/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant is directed to pay an amount of 68,078/- (Rupees Sixty Eight Thousand and Seventy Eight Only) and 9% interest from date of suit till date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of ledger account statement for the period from 01.04.2014 to 31.03.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of ledger account statement for the period from 01.04.2015 to 31.03.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of invoice No. 10395 dated 23.11.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of invoice No. 10698 dated 30.11.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer notice issued to the defendant demanding the outstanding balance.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Bank statement with 65B certificate.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/25/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases