Case Summary
This case involves M/s. Deedi Financial Service Ltd. as the decree holder and Sreedhanya C.S, Ashokan, and Abhilash K.C as judgment debtors. The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition due to the absence of the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent and did not press the memo.
The decree holder was absent and did not press the memo.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was absent and did not press the memo.
The decree holder was absent and did not press the memo.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Deedi Financial Service Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreedhanya C.S
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashokan
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abhilash K.C
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. James Ninan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition filed by the decree holder was dismissed due to no representation.
Evidence:
Decree Holder absent, no representation. Judgment debtor No.3 absent represented. On verification seen that Decree holder filed not press memo vide CF No.2825/2025. Petition dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.
Case Code Year
2023