Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1304/2020

Case between M/s. Contour Readymix Private Limited vs Muhammad Mansoor regarding recovery of payment for readymix concrete

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-07
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 11/07/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Contour Readymix Private Limited is suing Muhammad Mansoor for the recovery of a total amount of ₹2,39,131/-, which includes unpaid dues for supplied readymix concrete. The defendant claims he acted as an intermediary for another firm and has not received the goods as stated by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant had received the goods allegedly supplied. Instead, the evidence suggested a lack of a proper contract.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant had received the goods allegedly supplied. Instead, the evidence suggested a lack of a proper contract.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant received the goods or that a valid contract existed.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant received the goods or that a valid contract existed.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to successfully establish that the defendant had received the goods as alleged by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Contour Readymix Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammad Mansoor
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Purchase Order Confirmation Form, Invoice No. C 37/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 38/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 39/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 40/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 41/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 42/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 43/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 44/2018 -19, Invoice No. C 45/2018 -19, Ledger Account Statement, True copy of the Notice bearing No. CRPL: 12/2019-20, Extract of Board Resolution
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alias M Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.M Raphy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjali Elias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shaji Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N Ratheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Claim for recovery of a total amount of ₹2,39,131/- with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to successfully establish that the defendant had received the goods as alleged by the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Purchase Order Confirmation Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the agreement for supply of ready-mix concrete.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Purchase Order Confirmation Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Duplicate of Ext.A1, referenced for the terms of the purchase order.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence of delivery of goods, though signatures were disputed.
Reference:
Exts.A2 to A10
Document Type: Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided details of transactions between plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: True copy of the Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served for demanding payment of the outstanding amount from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Returned Postal Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Extract of Board Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorized PW1 to file the suit on behalf of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Contour Readymix Private Limited vs Muhammad Mansoor regarding recovery of payment for readymix concrete
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Contour Readymix Private Limited vs Muhammad Mansoor regarding recovery of payment for readymix concrete

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 06/29/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/07/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won