Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 69/2023

Case between M/s. Colour Plus & Co vs Shameer Marickar et al regarding suit rejection.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s. Colour Plus & Co as the plaintiff and Shameer Marickar and others as defendants. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee and no representation made.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to represent and pay the necessary court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to represent and pay the necessary court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear in court and pay the required fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear in court and pay the required fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Balance Court Fee not paid despite numerous chances.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 19.06.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Plaintiff no representation. Balance Court Fee not paid despite numerous chances. Suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Colour Plus & Co
Relation
Rep.by its sole proprietor Naveen B
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shameer Marickar
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o. Dr. V.M Fazil Marickar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Andonious Contractor LLP
Relation
Rep. by Managing Partner Shameer Marickar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nest Infratech (Nest Realtime India Pvt Ltd)
Relation
Rep. by Managing Partner, Shameer Marickar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Blaze K. Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nikhil Sanjay
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to no representation and balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite numerous chances. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Colour Plus & Co vs Shameer Marickar et al regarding suit rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Colour Plus & Co vs Shameer Marickar et al regarding suit rejection.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won