Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.248/2019

Case between M/s. Cochin Drug House vs Mr. Jose regarding realization of money.

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-07
Duration
approximately-5 years 1 month 18 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a partnership firm, M/s. Cochin Drug House, suing Mr. Jose for the recovery of outstanding payments for medicines sold on credit. The defendant argues that the suit is barred by limitation and only a small amount is outstanding.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for realization of Rs.23,466/- has been dismissed as it was found to be barred by limitation. The defendant is entitled to the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was barred by law of limitation as it was instituted beyond the permitted time frame after the expiry of the credit period.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Cochin Drug House (Age not specified years) Earlier functioned at Kattikkaran Complex, Kattikkaran Road, Kochi, Pin – 682 018, Now functioning at JSN Towers, Mankuzhy Road, Edappally Toll Junction

Defendants

Mr. Jose (Age not specified years) Kuruppampady, Perumbavoor, Pin – 683 545

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover Rs.23,466/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Accordingly I have no hesitation to hold that plaintiff is not entitled for any amounts from defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the reconstituted partnership deed.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Bills
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copies of bills from 06.03.2014 to 15.12.2015.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card related to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 02/19/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases