Case Summary
The case involves M/s Canara Bank as the plaintiff represented by its manager against Sreekumar S, the defendant. The suit was filed for the realization of money.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and made no representation in court. Consequently, the plaint was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekumar.S
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I. Sowfiuar & U. Ullaskumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's plaint was rejected due to absence and non-remittance of BCF.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Sreekumar.S regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Sreekumar.S regarding realisation of money.