Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1187 of 2020

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Smt. Mini Jayakumar, Smt. Asha Prabhath regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-03-19
Duration
approximately-4 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves M/s. Canara Bank and defendants Smt. Mini Jayakumar and Smt. Asha Prabhath regarding the recovery of a loan amount due. The defendants defaulted on repayment of a loan taken from the bank, leading to this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.64,696 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the loan agreement and the defendants' defaults.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.64,696 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Head office at 112, J.C Road, Bangalore and one of its branch office at Maradu, Ernakulam.

Defendants

Smt. Mini Jayakumar (47 years) Kakkanam Veedu, St. Martin Road, Palarivattom, Palarivattom P.O, Pin 682025, Ernakulam. Smt. Asha Prabhath (Age not specified years) Kakkanam Veedu, St. Martin Road, Palarivattom, Palarivattom P.O, Pin 682025, Ernakulam.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.64,696 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.64,696.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to get the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
B) The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the sanction of the loan to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating the delivery of the loan amount to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment from the defendants confirming their debt to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document that shows the plaintiff's attempt to notify the defendants regarding the default.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the sending of the notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the communication sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Computer printout of statement of account for the period
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to substantiate the claim regarding the amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/24/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases