Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1213/2022

Case between M/S Canara Bank vs Pearly Jerry et al regarding realization of money.

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-06-15
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/S Canara Bank filed a suit against Pearly Jerry and Rajesh N. Nair for the realization of loan repayment. The defendants defaulted on their repayment obligations concerning a loan taken for business purposes.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of M/S Canara Bank, ordering the defendants to pay the amount due along with applicable interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs.6,53,348.53/- along with interest @11% per annum from 26.11.2022 till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the case with credible evidence and proved the defendants' default in repayment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendants shall pay Rs.6,53,348.53/- along with interest @11% per annum from 26.11.2022 till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/S Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Kakkanad Branch II, Josh Towers, Padamugal Colony Junction, Vazhakkala, Kakkanad, Kochi – 682 030

Defendants

Pearly Jerry (58 years) Flat No.6B, ‘Neerakkal’ House, Trans Avenue, Mavelipuram, Kakkanad, Kochi – 682 030 Rajesh.N.Nair (42 years) ‘Kapplingattu’ House, Idiyanal, Kottayam, Pin – 686 576

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay Rs.6,53,348.53/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.6,53,348.53/- (Rupees Six lakhs fifty three thousand three hundred and forty eight and fifty three paise only) along with interest ...
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the first defendant in favour of M/S Syndicate Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for Rs.5,00,000/- issued by D1 in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Guarantee Agreement executed by D2.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of statement of account of defendant’s loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt executed by D1.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt and security executed by D1.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt and security executed by D1.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Returned Postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned postal cover of D1.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned postal envelope of D2.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Tue, 09/27/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases