Case Summary
M/s Canara Bank has filed a suit for realization of money against M/s Megha Floor Mill. The court has rejected the plaint as it was not remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of BCF by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected U/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Megha Floor Mill
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I.Sowfiuer & U. Ullas Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff's suit for the realization of money was rejected.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected U/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Canara Bank vs M/s Megha Floor Mill regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Canara Bank vs M/s Megha Floor Mill regarding realization of money.