OS. No.358/2022

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs M/s. Mahalekshmi Self Help Group et al regarding realization of money.

Court

Munsiff Court, Kollam

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-10-03

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s. Canara Bank seeking to realize money from M/s. Mahalekshmi Self Help Group and its members. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent their case.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent their case.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s. Canara Bank
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M/s. Mahalekshmi Self Help Group
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Smt. Shyla
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o Shahudeen Koya

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shehina
Party Age: 48
Relation: D/o Hamsa

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sathi Amma
Party Age: 51
Relation: W/o Sadanandan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Subi
Party Age: 47
Relation: W/o Vinod

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: I. Sowfiuar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Nil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Evidence:

Plaintiff absent, no representation. Plaintiff called absent, no representation on his part. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification