Case Summary
M/s Cananra Bank filed a suit for realisation of money against M/s Kuppayakkada and Saifuniza. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to absence and failure to remit the required fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required fees.
Plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required fees.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Cananra Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Kuppayakkada
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saifuniza
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I. Sowfiuar & U. Ullas Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for realisation of money.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. No BCF remitted. Sufficient opportunity given. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs M/s Kuppayakkada et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs M/s Kuppayakkada et al regarding realisation of money.