O.S No. 946/2013

Case between M/s. Benhur Chits (P) Ltd. vs Ahammedkutty. P. K. et al regarding decree execution.

Court

THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2024-10-19

Duration

approximately-11 years

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Benhur Chits (P) Ltd. is the decree holder seeking execution against judgment debtors Ahammedkutty. P. K., Aneesh A.V., and Anilkumar M.A. This case involves the transfer of a decree to the Munsiff’s Court, Kochi due to non-satisfaction.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The court ordered the transfer of the decree to Munsiff’s Court, Kochi due to non-satisfaction.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder was able to establish the necessity for executing the decree.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder was able to establish the necessity for executing the decree.

Supporting Evidence

The court recognized the application regarding execution of the decree.

Judgment Evidence:

Postage remitted. Transfer decree to Munsiff’s Court, Kochi with decree of non satisfaction.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s. Benhur Chits (P) Ltd.
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ahammedkutty. P. K.
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Aneesh A.V.
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anilkumar M.A.
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K. V Jayachandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Raju V. Mathew
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K. J Harisankar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Aiswariya V. R
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification