Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1036/2023

Case between M/s Balanand Enterprises vs Bombay Light House et al regarding Court Fee Payment

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Balanand Enterprises filed a suit against Bombay Light House and others. The court rejected the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not pay the necessary court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Balanand Enterprises (Age not specified years) 62/4211 A, Monastry Road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 011

Defendants

Bombay Light House (Age not specified years) 40/4381 A, Hawa Bai Trust Building, Jews Street, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035 Pulikkottil Kunjan Joju (55 years) Pulikkottil House, N.K. Sreedharan Road, Vaduthala, Ernakulam, Kerala Jincy Joju (Age not specified years) 40/4381A, Hawa Bai Trust Building, Jews Street, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaintiff rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases