Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 225/2025

Case between M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP vs Track Holidays (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 days
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership firm represented by Joshila Ramesh, which provided recruitment services to Track Holidays (P) Ltd. The defendants failed to pay the agreed consultation fee for the services rendered, leading the plaintiff to file a suit for recovery of the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the amount claimed along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.34,692/- along with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the amount claimed along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim was established by unrebutted oral testimony and evidence submitted by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim was established by unrebutted oral testimony and evidence submitted by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A3 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.34,692/- (Rupees Thirty Four Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety Two only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Track Holidays (P) Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Manager, Track Holidays
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of appointment letter, Copy of Invoice, Copy of demand notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rejimon P.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajeevan John T.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mahima Marine Reji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vivekjos Puthukulangara
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nikita Nair C.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is granted the right to recover an amount of Rs.34,692/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.34,692/- (Rupees Thirty Four Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety Two only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of the decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.34,692/- (Rupees Thirty Four Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety Two only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at 6% per annum from the date of the decree till the realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.34,692/- (Rupees Thirty Four Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety Two only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs associated with the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Appointment Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the recruitment agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the invoice issued by the plaintiff for the consultation fee which the defendant failed to pay.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a formal request for payment sent to the defendant, notifying them of the unpaid fees.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP vs Track Holidays (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP vs Track Holidays (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 08/08/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Maker Village vs M/s. V Robotics Innovations Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bajaj Electricals Limited vs Viswas Marketting Agencies regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won