Case Summary
The plaintiff, a Limited Liability Partnership firm, provided placement services to the defendant, who failed to comply with the terms of their agreement. The suit concerns the recovery of a consultation fee due to the defendant prematurely leaving the job.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.41,300, plus interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in part, allowing the plaintiff to recover Rs.41,300 from the defendant. Interest and costs of the suit are also awarded to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's evidence remained uncontroverted as the defendant did not appear in court.
The plaintiff's evidence remained uncontroverted as the defendant did not appear in court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's evidence remained uncontroverted as the defendant did not appear in court.
The plaintiff's evidence remained uncontroverted as the defendant did not appear in court.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A5 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.41,300/- (Rupees Forty One Thousand and Three Hundred only) from the defendant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Amal Dev K.B.
- Party Age
- 25
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of appointment letter dated 10.04.2024, Copy of Invoice dated 01.07.2024, Copy of demand notice dated 02.09.2024, Original postal receipt dated 25.09.2024, Original acknowledgement card dated 04.10.2024
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rejimon P.A.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajeevan John T.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mahima Marine Reji
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vivekjos Puthukulangara
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nikita Nair C.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.41,300 from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.41,300/- (Rupees Forty One Thousand and Three Hundred only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 12% per annum for Rs.41,300 from the date of suit till date decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.41,300/- (Rupees Forty One Thousand and Three Hundred only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 6% per annum for Rs.41,300 from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.41,300/- (Rupees Forty One Thousand and Three Hundred only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Appointment Letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It establishes the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding job placement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It shows the demand for the consultancy fee that remains unpaid by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Demand Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is a notification sent to the defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as proof that the demand notice was sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It confirms that the defendant received the demand notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP vs Mr. Amal Dev K.B. regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. ASPIREJO HR SOLUTIONS LLP vs Mr. Amal Dev K.B. regarding realization of money