Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1060/2022

Case between M/s APT Computer zone vs Suji Mathew regarding refund of court fee

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-10-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s APT Computer zone, is represented by Neetha Antony Athiparambil and has filed a suit regarding a mediation agreement. The defendant, Suji Mathew, is the proprietor of a business and is represented in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed as per the mediation agreement, which is considered lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as part of the settlement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed as per the mediation agreement, which is considered lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as part of the settlement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement is found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation agreement is found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the mediation agreement seems to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed as per the mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s APT Computer zone
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Neetha Antony Athiparambil
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o Nixon P Jose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suji Mathew
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Varghese
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reynold Fernandez N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amal George Mevada
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sujith Kumar T.U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Refund of court fee to the plaintiff as per the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
In light of the settlement arrived at in mediation, plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s APT Computer zone vs Suji Mathew regarding refund of court fee
Case Code Year
Case between M/s APT Computer zone vs Suji Mathew regarding refund of court fee

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Cochin
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won