Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1058/2024

Case between M/s Angelblues Aviation & Tourism Academy Pvt Ltd. vs Bindu Rajan et al regarding amendment of plaint.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Angelblues Aviation & Tourism Academy Pvt Ltd. is seeking to amend its plaint to include details about a prior injunction obtained by the defendants in another suit. The defendants argue the amendment is based on a willful suppression of facts.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to amend the plaint but ruled that the amendment would not relate back to the date of the suit, thereby preserving the defendants' grounds for defense.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the amendment sought was essential for a proper adjudication of the issues.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petitioner is allowed in part. Carry out amendment within 15 days.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Angelblues Aviation & Tourism Academy Pvt Ltd. (Age not specified years) C.C.No.62/4627 C.K.Building, Karikkamuri Cross Road, Karikkamuri, Ernakulam – 682 011

Defendants

Bindu Rajan (49 years) Chembakassery, Karikkamury, Ernakulam – 682 011 Aishwaria (21 years) Chembakassery, Karikkamury, Ernakulam – 682 011 Thankamani Rajan (70 years) Chembakassery, Karikkamury, Ernakulam – 682 011

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Amendment to the plaint was allowed but will not relate back to the date of the suit.
Evidence:
Thus, it is hereby made clear that amendment as sought for is allowed but the same will not relate back to the date of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases