Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 64/2017

Case between M/s A.M.Mohammed Usman & Brother vs Sunitha Thajudhin et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s A.M.Mohammed Usman & Brother filed a suit against Sunitha Thajudhin and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no representation or proof affidavit was filed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s A.M.Mohammed Usman & Brother (Age not specified years) P.B No. 2664, Broadway, Ernakulam,Pin 682 031

Defendants

Sunitha Thajudhin (Age not specified years) Elayedathu Puthen veetil, Thiruvathara, Chavakadu P.O, Pin- 680 506, Thrissur Shakier Thajudhin (Age not specified years) Shakier Mansil, Anadu Grama Panchayath, near Kristhukiran Convent School, Tholicode P.O, Pin 695 541, Nedumangadu, Thiruvananthapuram Shabjan Jamal (Age not specified years) Pallitharayil house, Punnayurkulam, Chavakadu, Thrissur, pin – 679 561

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases