Case Summary
M/s A.M.Mohammed Usman & Brother filed a suit against Sunitha Thajudhin and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no representation or proof affidavit was filed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s A.M.Mohammed Usman & Brother
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunitha Thajudhin
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shakier Thajudhin
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shabjan Jamal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Peter Tharakan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Francis Peter Tharakan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shaijan Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s A.M.Mohammed Usman & Brother vs Sunitha Thajudhin et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between M/s A.M.Mohammed Usman & Brother vs Sunitha Thajudhin et al regarding dismissal for default