Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.748/2022

Case between M/s Ambika Textiles vs Alappad Silks regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Ambika Textiles, represented by its proprietor Manish Tawari, filed a suit against Alappad Silks for recovery of a debt. The defendant failed to appear in court and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant shall pay a total of Rs.93,868 with interest to the plaintiff. Additionally, the defendant's assets are liable to satisfy the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.93,868 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case with unchallenged evidence, proving the defendant's debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.93,868 along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Manish Tawari (42 years) Door No. C.C. 67/9366-A1, Fancy Flower mart Jn. Gopalaprabhu Road, Ernakulam

Defendants

Shanavas (35 years) Alappad Silks, Bharanikavu, Adoor Road, Kollam, Pin – 690 52

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff requested recovery of Rs.93,868 with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.93,868 with interest
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant's personal assets are liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendant shall be personally and his assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as proof of demand for payment sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence that the lawyer's notice was sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the financial transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases