Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.748/2022

Case between M/s Ambika Textiles vs Alappad Silks regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Ambika Textiles, represented by its proprietor Manish Tawari, filed a suit against Alappad Silks for recovery of a debt. The defendant failed to appear in court and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant shall pay a total of Rs.93,868 with interest to the plaintiff. Additionally, the defendant's assets are liable to satisfy the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.93,868 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant shall pay a total of Rs.93,868 with interest to the plaintiff. Additionally, the defendant's assets are liable to satisfy the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case with unchallenged evidence, proving the defendant's debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case with unchallenged evidence, proving the defendant's debt.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.93,868 with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.93,868 along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Ambika Textiles
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alappad Silks
Plaintiffs Documents
Office copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant, Postal receipt, Statement of ledger account of defendant maintained by plaintiff
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pradeesh Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff requested recovery of Rs.93,868 with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.93,868 with interest
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant's personal assets are liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendant shall be personally and his assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as proof of demand for payment sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence that the lawyer's notice was sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the financial transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Ambika Textiles vs Alappad Silks regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Ambika Textiles vs Alappad Silks regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won