Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 18/2022

Case between M/s Alide Communications vs Mr.Abdul Jaseel regarding realization of money

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-04-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, a registered partnership firm, is suing the defendant for the realization of a debt of Rs 51,029/- owed from a business transaction. The defendant denies any liability, claiming that the plaintiff has violated their distributor agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was unable to prove the existence of any debt owed by the defendant. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was unable to prove the existence of any debt owed by the defendant. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was unable to prove his case even by a degree of preponderance of probability. It is found that no amount is due to the plaintiff from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the discussion as held on issue No.1 &2, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Alide Communications
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.Anil Koshi
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Abdul Jaseel
Plaintiffs Documents
Registration certificate of partnership firm, Certified copy of reconstituted deed of partnership, Account statement maintained at Alide communications for the period 01.04.20 to 12.11.21, Copy of lawyer notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh Kumar T.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Yasil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thajmal Saleek E.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.51,029/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
It is found that no amount is due to the plaintiff from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the registration of the partnership firm.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Reconstituted Deed of Partnership
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the partnership agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Maintained at Alide Communications for the relevant period.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows demand for repayment sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Alide Communications vs Mr.Abdul Jaseel regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Alide Communications vs Mr.Abdul Jaseel regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won