Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.99/2023

Case between Mr.Shijith P vs Mr.Vishnu C regarding realisation of money

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months 28 days
Case Closed
Sat, 06/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Mr.Shijith P, the plaintiff, who claims that the defendant, Mr.Vishnu C, failed to fulfil his duties as a collection executive, resulting in financial penalties for the plaintiff. The defendant remained absent during the proceedings and was set ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover a sum of Rs. 74,779 from the defendant along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 74,779 from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover a sum of Rs. 74,779 from the defendant along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff entitled him to a decree as prayed for.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff entitled him to a decree as prayed for.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 with Ext.A1 to A6 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 74,779 from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.Shijith P
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Vishnu C
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Warning memo with penalty issued by HDFC Bank, Copy of amount transaction details of HDFC Bank, Copy of ID card issued by HDFC Bank to Vishnu K, Copy of lawyer notice sent by Adv.PP Surendran to Vishnu C, Reply of lawyer notice sent by Adv.Harikrishnan KK to Adv.PP Surendran, Copy of collection Agency agreement of HDFC Bank with Pranavam Solutions.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri PP Surendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 74,779/- from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 74,779/- (Rupees Seventy Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy Nine only) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Warning memo with penalty
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the penalty imposed on the plaintiff due to the defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of amount transaction details
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided details relevant to the amount in question.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of ID card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to identify the defendant's role as a collection executive.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence showing the plaintiff's demand for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document showed the defendant's denial of the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of collection Agency agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided context for the plaintiff's relationship with the HDFC Bank and the collection executive.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr.Shijith P vs Mr.Vishnu C regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Mr.Shijith P vs Mr.Vishnu C regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode district
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 07/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won