Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 164/2024

Case between Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim vs M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET et al regarding rent control petition.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim filed a rent control petition against M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET and other respondents. The matter was settled, and the petition was not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed following a settlement between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim (46 years years) House No. 192, Panampilly Nagar P.O, Ernakulam-682036

Defendants

M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET (Age not specified years) 367A, Ward No.1, Kalady via, Naduvattom Post, Ernakulam District, PIN 683574 Bhavesh Ravindra Gokal (50 years years) 420, CCI Chambers, 3rd floor, Dinsha Vacha Road, Mumbai-400020 Sumesh Karunakaran (59 years years) Temple Rock, Adoor Palam, Kadachira Post, Kannur, PIN.670621 M/s. SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET (Age not specified years) 56/2349, Panampilly Nagar P.O, Ernakulam - 682036

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petition is not pressed and hence the rent control petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter is settled and hence petition is not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases