Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1338/2024

Case between Mrs. Nitha Dileep Kumar vs Dr. Dhanya Viswam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-19
Duration
approximately-10 months 1 day

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mrs. Nitha Dileep Kumar, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Dr. Dhanya Viswam, who is obstructing her business operations as a tenant. The defendant has unlawfully interfered with the plaintiff's rights as a tenant, causing financial losses.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in part, granting the plaintiff a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent interference with her business operations.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's business operations.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her case through unrebutted testimony and evidence showing unlawful obstruction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed in part as follows. i.A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant from obstructing the peaceful conducting of the business in the plaint A schedule properties by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mrs. Nitha Dileep Kumar (59 years) Confident Bellatrix III, Mekkara, Tripunithura.

Defendants

Dr. Dhanya Viswam (54 years) Abhayam House, Kanichukulangara Cherthala P.O, Alappuzha.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from obstructing business operations
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant from obstructing the peaceful conducting of the business...
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to realize costs of the suit from the defendant
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant and from her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Printout of license
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's legal right to operate the business.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Printout of property tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows compliance with local tax obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Printout of professional tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates payment of professional tax for conducting business.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Printout of GST Registration certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the plaintiff's GST registration for business operations.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows authorization in connection with the case.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided findings that supported the evidence in the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch and photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting the commission report findings.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a) & C1(b)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Testimony of the plaintiff provided additional context to the claims.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 10/12/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases