Case Summary
Mrs. Kelin Sabu filed a rent control petition against M/s. Delhi Desi Dhaba and its managing partner P.V. Raju, along with another respondent. The petition was ultimately dismissed as not pressed with liberty granted to the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed, allowing the petitioner the liberty to take further action.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner chose not to press the rent control petition.
The petitioner chose not to press the rent control petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner chose not to press the rent control petition.
The petitioner chose not to press the rent control petition.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner filed a memo stating that the rent control petition is not pressed with liberty.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty granted to the petitioner.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mrs. Kelin Sabu
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Delhi Desi Dhaba
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.V Raju
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Kareem T.V
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Devadas H. Mallan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.T. Mohan Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George Cherian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh Cherian Karipparambil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jiji Nikhil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.S. Unnikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aleena Maria Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ardra Krishnan M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Fida P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Diya Merin Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty granted to the petitioner.
Evidence:
Petitioner filed a memo stating that the rent control petition is not pressed with liberty. Heard. Accepted. Hence rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty granted to the petitioner.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mrs. Kelin Sabu vs M/s. Delhi Desi Dhaba et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mrs. Kelin Sabu vs M/s. Delhi Desi Dhaba et al regarding Rent Control Petition