Case Summary
The petitioner, Mr.P.K.Abu Fasal, filed a rent control petition against Mr.M.K.Noushad. The petition was dismissed as not pressed since the respondent surrendered the petition schedule building along with its key.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed after the respondent surrendered the property in question.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr.P.K.Abu Fasal
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.M.K.Noushad
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition under Section 11(2)(b), 11(3) & 11(4)(v) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jimmy George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Priya Devi
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rama Narayana Prabhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr.P.K.Abu Fasal vs Mr.M.K.Noushad regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mr.P.K.Abu Fasal vs Mr.M.K.Noushad regarding rent control petition