Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 335/2025

Case between Mr. V. K Prathapachandran vs Sukumaran Mani regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. V. K Prathapachandran filed a suit against Sukumaran Mani for the recovery of unpaid rent and dues amounting to Rs. 1,38,000/- following a lease agreement. The defendant vacated the premises but failed to clear his outstanding payments or respond to legal notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of Rs. 1,38,000/- plus interest and costs from the defendant. The defendant failed to appear or contest the claims.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,38,000/- and interest from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of Rs. 1,38,000/- plus interest and costs from the defendant. The defendant failed to appear or contest the claims.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claims were unchallenged and supported by the evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's claims were unchallenged and supported by the evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
Even in the absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict this proof of plaint claim, I learn that same remains uncontroverted and accordingly admitted and the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,38,000/- from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. V. K Prathapachandran
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sukumaran Mani
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lease agreement dated 06.02.2022, Lawyer Notice dated 01.12.2023, acknowledgment card dated 01.12.2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manuel Vivera
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Baby Antony
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 1,38,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,38,000/- (Rupees one lakh thirty eight thousand only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to 12% interest per annum on Rs. 1,38,000/- from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
2. Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.1,38,000/- (Rupees one lakh thirty eight thousand only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to 6% interest per annum on Rs. 1,38,000/- from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
3. Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs. 1,38,000/- (Rupees one lakh thirty eight thousand only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
4. Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the lease agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demanded payment from the defendant and was part of the plaintiff's proof.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms the defendant's receipt of the lawyer's notice demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Mr. V. K Prathapachandran vs Sukumaran Mani regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. V. K Prathapachandran vs Sukumaran Mani regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 02/06/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jagen N. Lalan vs Mr.Ratheesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won