Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 355/2024

Case between Mr. Stanislaus Fenol vs Mr. Abdul Nazar A. A regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. Stanislaus Fenol, the plaintiff, did not represent himself in court and failed to take the necessary steps to issue summons. As a result, the case was dismissed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff failed to appear or take necessary actions, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's failure to represent and take steps led to the dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 26.03.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. Stanislaus Fenol (48 years) CANA KPRA, 75, New Road, Kalamassery, Chagampuzha Nagar P.O, Thrikkakara North (Part), Ernakulam, PIN – 682 030

Defendants

Mr. Abdul Nazar A. A (50 years) D- 405, 4th Floor, Tower -D, PURAVA Eternity, Athani, Kakkand, Thengode P.O, Ernakulam – 682 030

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases