Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 318/2009

Case between Mr. Prathapan et al vs Mr. Manoharan et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-11
Duration
approximately-15 years
Case Closed
Tue, 03/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Mr. Prathapan, Mr. Sahadevan, and others against defendants Mr. Manoharan, Smt. Thankamma Krishnan, and others regarding a legal dispute. The suit was dismissed by the court due to the plaintiffs' absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the plaintiffs not present or ready for evidence and therefore dismissed the case as the plaintiffs did not show up for the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiffs not present or ready for evidence and therefore dismissed the case as the plaintiffs did not show up for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The suit was dismissed by the court due to the plaintiffs' absence.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Prathapan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Sahadevan
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Kumar
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Pavithran
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Manoharan
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Thankamma Krishnan
Party Age
79
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Sasi
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Bahuleyan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. A Martin Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. A Sulekha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Alias M.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Robin C. Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to their absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Not inclined to grant further time. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. Prathapan et al vs Mr. Manoharan et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Prathapan et al vs Mr. Manoharan et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2009 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won