Case Summary
Mr. M.K Chandran filed a rent control petition against M/s. SPARKLING KAY KAY VENTURES PVT.LTD. The matter was settled between the parties and the petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed, following a settlement between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr. M.K Chandran
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. SPARKLING KAY KAY VENTURES PVT.LTD
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Stamp on Rent Control Petition, Stamp on Vakalath, Stamp on petition, Stamp on Document
Defendants Documents
Stamp on Vakalath, Stamp on petition
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.S.Mohamed Usman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Priya Devi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arshad Ameen N.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ashna T Ashik
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anwin Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aditya Venugopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mahesh Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Saranya Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abhishek S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rohit P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopika B.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Rent control petition not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits matter settled between parties and hence rent control petition not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. M.K Chandran vs M/s. SPARKLING KAY KAY VENTURES PVT.LTD regarding rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. M.K Chandran vs M/s. SPARKLING KAY KAY VENTURES PVT.LTD regarding rent control petition.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement