Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 108/2025

Case between Mr. M.K Chandran vs M/s. SPARKLING KAY KAY VENTURES PVT.LTD regarding rent control petition.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mr. M.K Chandran filed a rent control petition against M/s. SPARKLING KAY KAY VENTURES PVT.LTD. The matter was settled between the parties and the petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed, following a settlement between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mr. M.K Chandran (73 years) Flat No.301,C.C No.XL1/907, D2, SUI PALACE, Chittoor Road, Pullepady P.O, Kovilvattom Desom, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam, Pin-682 035

Defendants

M/s. SPARKLING KAY KAY VENTURES PVT.LTD (55 years) Kisna Diamond and Gold, Ground floor, Kumarapilla Estate, Near M.G.Road Metro Station, Kochi-682 035, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits matter settled between parties and hence rent control petition not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases