Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P No. 397/2024 in RCP No. 186/2020

Case between Mr. Jayadeep Gopinath et al vs Tino Thomas regarding decree execution

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the execution petition filed by Mr. Jayadeep Gopinath and others against Tino Thomas for satisfying a decree. The court has closed the execution petition after the decree was satisfied.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the execution petition to be closed as the decree was satisfied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the execution petition to be closed as the decree was satisfied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree was satisfied as per the court's finding.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree was satisfied as per the court's finding.
Supporting Evidence
The court has stated that the decree was satisfied.

Judgment Evidence:

Delivery effected. Decree satisfied. E.P Closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Jayadeep Gopinath
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Jayadev Gopinath
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tino Thomas
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Enoch David Simon Joel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Sreedev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rony Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Leo Lukose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Karol Mathews Sebastian Alencherry
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Derick Mathai Saji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Karan Scaria Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ittoop Joy Thattil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Gigimol
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arathi Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanitha P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mary Ragula A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree satisfied.
Evidence:
Delivery effected. Decree satisfied.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. Jayadeep Gopinath et al vs Tino Thomas regarding decree execution
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Jayadeep Gopinath et al vs Tino Thomas regarding decree execution

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won