Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 888/2025

Case between M.P. Prasad vs Ganga Sreekumar regarding settlement of disputes

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.P. Prasad is the plaintiff and Ganga Sreekumar is the defendant. The case involved a dispute that was ultimately settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in terms of the report. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as per law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund court fee, if any, as per law
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in terms of the report. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as per law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report was accepted as it was found lawful and not opposed to public policy, signed by all parties to the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation report was accepted as it was found lawful and not opposed to public policy, signed by all parties to the suit.
Supporting Evidence
This court is satisfied that the parties entered into compromise voluntarily.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence mediation report is accepted. The suit is decreed in terms of mediation report. Mediation report shall forms part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.P. Prasad
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ganga Sreekumar
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinu Chand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.R. Vinod Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abu Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aju Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Geevarghese Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ragin Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abijith C.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajan K. Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kevin Seby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anu Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.A. Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjali kishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence mediation report is accepted. The suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to refund court fee.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to refund court fee, if any, as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the commission report filed in the case.
Reference:
Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in terms of the mediation report.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.P. Prasad vs Ganga Sreekumar regarding settlement of disputes
Case Code Year
Case between M.P. Prasad vs Ganga Sreekumar regarding settlement of disputes

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won