Case Summary
The petitioners sought eviction of the respondents to start a supermarket business in the rented rooms, claiming bonafide need. The respondents disputed the claim stating they were dependent on the businesses conducted in the rooms and had no necessity to vacate.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and costs realization
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioners proved bonafide need and lack of availability of other spaces, supported by legal documents and witness testimonies.
Petitioners proved bonafide need and lack of availability of other spaces, supported by legal documents and witness testimonies.
Judgment Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled for an order u/s 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 as they put forward their bonafide need supported by substantial evidence.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Moochikkadan Sooppy Haji (74 years)
Iringallur Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirurangadi Taluk, PIN 676 304
Kunhimuhammed Haji (51 years)
Mangat Pallimalil House, Thanaloor Amsom and Post, Areekkad Desom, PIN 676 307, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Muhammed Basheer (Age not specified years)
Vadakkathintakath House, Thazheppalam, Pookkayil Post, Tirur Taluk