Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1470/2023

Case between Moni Mathew Panicker vs Babu Madhavan et al regarding plaint rejection

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-19
Duration
Case Code No.
1470
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moni Mathew Panicker filed a suit against Babu Madhavan and others regarding a legal matter. The court rejected the plaint due to the lack of remitting balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint filed by Moni Mathew Panicker was rejected by the court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint filed by Moni Mathew Panicker was rejected by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
No balance court fee seen remitted. No application filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moni Mathew Panicker
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu Madhavan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhu Babu
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sachin Babu
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Gopkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Krishna Das. R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to no balance court fee remitted.
Evidence:
No balance court fee seen remitted. No application filed. Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won