Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 755 /20 24

Case between Moncy Jacob et al vs B. Viswanathan et al regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court of Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Moncy Jacob and Dr. Basil M Jacob seeking compensation for losses incurred due to actions taken by defendants B. Viswanathan and B. Santha. The plaintiffs allege the defendants engaged in disruptive tactics to prevent them from utilizing property they purchased, resulting in financial losses and mental anguish.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs, allowing their petition for conditional attachment of the defendants' property due to the likelihood of them attempting to dispose of it.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional order of attachment made absolute.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs, allowing their petition for conditional attachment of the defendants' property due to the likelihood of them attempting to dispose of it.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case demonstrating potential loss of property rights due to the defendants’ actions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Upon perusal of the documents and the affidavit accompanying the petition, this court is satisfied that the defendants have not shown reasonable cause why they should not furnish security.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the above petition is allowed. Conditional order of attachment dated 18.07.2024 is made absolute.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moncy Jacob
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Basil M Jacob
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B. Viswanathan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B. Santha
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement between the 1st plaintiff and Mr. B.Krishna, Copy of relationship certificate issued from Nadama Village Office to D1, Copy of complaint to the Honorable Chief Minister by the second defendant, Notice issued by the District Registrar, Ernakulam, Reply submitted by the plaintiffs to the District Registrar General, Ernakulam, Copy of building certificate issued by the Tripunithura Municipality, Copy of Sale deed no. 2448/I/2021 of SRO, Thripunithura
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Albert Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayaprasad M R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashok K V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Radhika Rajasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anila Peter
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Simi S Ali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arshid M S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bahadur Shah
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saritha K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Conditional order of attachment of the immovable property.
Evidence:
The above petition is allowed. Conditional order of attachment dated 18.07.2024 is made absolute.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement between the 1st plaintiff and Mr. B. Krishna.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of relationship certificate issued from Nadama Village Office to D1.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of complaint to the Honorable Chief Minister by the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by the District Registrar, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply submitted by the plaintiffs to the District Registrar General, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of building certificate issued by the Tripunithura Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale deed no. 2448/I/2021 of SRO, Thripunithura.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Moncy Jacob et al vs B. Viswanathan et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Moncy Jacob et al vs B. Viswanathan et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won