Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 189/2022

Case between Monachen N.T vs E.S John et al regarding Suit for realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Code No.
189
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute over an agreement for the sale of property where the plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to return an advance payment of Rs. 7 lakhs. The defendants deny the financial transactions and responsibilities as claimed by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the plaintiff a decree for the realization of Rs. 6,50,000/- towards the advance payment made, along with interest at 6% per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 6,50,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the plaintiff a decree for the realization of Rs. 6,50,000/- towards the advance payment made, along with interest at 6% per annum.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff regarding the payment transactions to the third defendant was corroborated by bank statements.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff regarding the payment transactions to the third defendant was corroborated by bank statements.
Supporting Evidence
The statement would show that Rs.1,50,000/- sent by PW1 was credited to the third defendant’s account on 20.06.2020. Similarly, Rs.1 lakh was credited to the same account on 16.07.2020 and Rs.4 lakh on 20.07.2020. This would support the evidence of PW1 that he had transferred Rs.7 lakhs to the account of third defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 6,50,000/- (Rupees six lakhs fifty thousand only) as on the date of suit, with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization of the amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Monachen N.T
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
E.S John
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Marykutty John
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Victor
Party Age
60
Plaintiffs Documents
Property Sale Agreement executed between E.S John, Marykutty John and Monachen N.T, True copy of Lawyers notice, Acknowledgment Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hima K. Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajan Mathew .K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.6,50,000 with interest from the date of suit
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.6,50,000/- ... with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realisation of the amount.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Property Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed agreement for the transfer of plaint schedule properties
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice demanding return of advance amount from the defendants
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the legal notice by the defendants
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Unclaimed Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the notice sent to the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original bank statement submitted to support financial transactions (subject to proof)
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Statement of account of Victor K and Omana Victor verifying money transfers
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Certificate under section 63(4)(c) of the Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Act 2023
Reference:
Ext.X1(a)
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Certificate under section 2 A(b) and 2 A(c) of the Bankers Book of Evidence Act 1891
Reference:
Ext.X1(b)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Tue, 03/10/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Joshy George regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anilkumar K.K. et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jayakumar P.N. regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Pan Marketting vs Sri. Jobin Mathew @ George et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anishkumar K.C. regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won