Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 526/2024

Case between Moly E.T @ Mary vs Binu @ George regarding amendment of plaint.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moly E.T @ Mary, the plaintiff, has filed a petition seeking to amend the suit to include claims for compensation for damages to her property caused by the defendant, Binu @ George. The defendant opposes the amendment, claiming it is based on time-barred relief.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the amendment application sought by the plaintiff but stated that the question of limitation regarding the amendments is preserved for future consideration.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the amendment application sought by the plaintiff but stated that the question of limitation regarding the amendments is preserved for future consideration.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the amendments were necessary for a just determination of the matters in controversy between the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The amendment as sought for is seen to be one that is required for the determination of the matters in controversy as between the parties in the suit herein.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA stands allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moly E.T @ Mary
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu @ George
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinesh R. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jomol Pius
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K Ravi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Helen Paulose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Leela Lashmi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Amendment of plaint to include claim for damages and other reliefs.
Evidence:
The amendment as sought for is to be allowed for the just determination of the matters in controversy as between the parties herein.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Moly E.T @ Mary vs Binu @ George regarding amendment of plaint.
Case Code Year
Case between Moly E.T @ Mary vs Binu @ George regarding amendment of plaint.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won