Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 526/2024

Case between Moly E.T @ Mary vs Binu @ George regarding amendment of plaint.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moly E.T @ Mary, the plaintiff, has filed a petition seeking to amend the suit to include claims for compensation for damages to her property caused by the defendant, Binu @ George. The defendant opposes the amendment, claiming it is based on time-barred relief.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the amendment application sought by the plaintiff but stated that the question of limitation regarding the amendments is preserved for future consideration.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the amendments were necessary for a just determination of the matters in controversy between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA stands allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Moly E.T @ Mary (60 years years) Erathara House, Muriyathparambu, North Janatha Road, Palarivattom P.O, Pin – 682 025, Edappally South Village, Ernakulam.

Defendants

Binu @ George (53 years years) Erathara House, MNJRA 91, North Janatha, Palarivattom, Edappally South Village, Edappally P.O, Pin – 682 025.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Amendment of plaint to include claim for damages and other reliefs.
Evidence:
The amendment as sought for is to be allowed for the just determination of the matters in controversy as between the parties herein.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases