Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 433 OF 2014

Case between Moideenkutty et al vs Kadiyakutty et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-04-11
Duration
2 years 1 month

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed a suit seeking injunction against defendants, which was decreed based on a lawful compromise between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit based on a lawful compromise between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful, compromise is recorded and the suit is decreed as per terms of compromise. Compromise IA.1061/2017 shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Moideenkutty (47 years) Naduvattom amsom, Chelloor desom, Tirur Taluk Hussan (46 years) Naduvattom amsom, Chelloor desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Kadiyakutty (68 years) Naduvattom amsom, Chelloor desom, Tirur Taluk Adakkuthu Biyya (50 years) Naduvattom amsom, Chelloor desom, Tirur Taluk Adakkuthu Rafi (28 years) Naduvattom amsom, Chelloor desom, Tirur Taluk Laila (30 years) Naduvattom amsom, Chelloor desom, Tirur Taluk Nishad (40 years) Naduvattom amsom, Chelloor desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed as per terms of compromise
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, compromise is recorded and the suit is decreed as per terms of compromise. Compromise IA.1061/2017 shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 04/11/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases