ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 433 OF 2014

Case between Moideenkutty et al vs Kadiyakutty et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-04-11
Duration
2 years 1 month
Case Closed
Tue, 04/11/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed a suit seeking injunction against defendants, which was decreed based on a lawful compromise between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit based on a lawful compromise between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit based on a lawful compromise between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful, compromise is recorded and the suit is decreed as per terms of compromise. Compromise IA.1061/2017 shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moideenkutty
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o. Pottammal Vakayil Mammalihaji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hussan
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o. Pottammal Vakayil Mammalihaji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kadiyakutty
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o. Moideenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adakkuthu Biyya
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o. Moideenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adakkuthu Rafi
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o. Biyya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laila
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o. Biyya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nishad
Party Age
40
Relation
H/o. Laila
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed as per terms of compromise
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, compromise is recorded and the suit is decreed as per terms of compromise. Compromise IA.1061/2017 shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Moideenkutty et al vs Kadiyakutty et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Moideenkutty et al vs Kadiyakutty et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 04/11/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/11/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 04/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 04/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Nalakath Muhammed Salih et al vs Kayattum Parambil Ibrahim et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Raphy Kooliyath vs Krishnakumar.K regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Saidalavi et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Yousef vs Mandakathingal Kunhimuhammed et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Arangath Parambil Ali vs Abdul Rasaq et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed