Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T.No:117/2017

Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding offence under N.I. Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-08-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moideen. P filed a complaint against Abdu for an offence under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant later requested to withdraw the complaint, which the court permitted.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court permitted the complainant to withdraw the complaint and acquitted the accused. His bail bond was canceled and he was set at liberty.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court permitted the complainant to withdraw the complaint and acquitted the accused. His bail bond was canceled and he was set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was allowed to withdraw the complaint.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant was allowed to withdraw the complaint.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complainant and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.

Judgment Evidence:

In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moideen. P
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdu
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.A Samad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.E.M Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to withdraw the complaint
Evidence:
the complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complainant and having satisfied that here are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Acquittal of the accused
Evidence:
the accused is acquitted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding offence under N.I. Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Parappara Abdu vs Moideenkutty regarding jurisdiction transfer
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between Kunhai vs Abdu Shukkur regarding withdrawal of complaint
Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhipathumma vs Abdu Shukkur regarding withdrawal of complaint
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kunhali vs Abdu Shukkur regarding withdrawal of complaint
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Kabeer vs Abdul Azeez regarding permission to withdraw complaint
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case Defendant Won