Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 936/2024

Case between Mohanan et al vs Vijaykumar et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Mohanan, were involved in a civil suit against the defendants, including Vijaykumar. The case was dismissed for lack of representation by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs failed to take necessary steps in the matter.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs failed to take necessary steps in the matter.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Girija
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rema
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijaykumar
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinitha
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nirmala
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Udhayakumar
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.R.Ramanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Silpa M.U
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi Ramanath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.Vijayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnu R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Archana P Vijayan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohanan et al vs Vijaykumar et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Mohanan et al vs Vijaykumar et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won