Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 174/2025

Case between Mohammed Shefiq E.K vs K.Pathrose et al regarding compromise agreement.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-04-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohammed Shefiq E.K filed a suit against K.Pathrose and Rosily Thomas concerning a compromise agreement. The court found the terms of the agreement lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the compromise agreement found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Shefiq E.K
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.Pathrose
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rosily Thomas
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.C Sajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court acknowledged the mediation report and the compromise agreement, which were deemed lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Reference:
Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement, which forms part of the decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Shefiq E.K vs K.Pathrose et al regarding compromise agreement.
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Shefiq E.K vs K.Pathrose et al regarding compromise agreement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won