Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by Mohammed Ismail P.A and Mohammed Noor P.A, were involved in a suit against the defendants which included Dr. Dhanush and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's non-appearance and failure to present evidence. Costs were awarded against the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not ready to present evidence.
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not ready to present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not ready to present evidence.
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not ready to present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Case taken up on roll call and on multiple occasions thereafter. Plaintiff is not present.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohammed Ismail P.A
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohammed Noor P.A
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr. Dhanush
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Swetha Jilson
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed Yusuf P. A
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T. B Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T. T Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dipin Dileep
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. R Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.S Letha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreerekha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishna Bindu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Haifa Sabu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ann Rose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mariya Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Mohammed Al Rafi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thanuja Maria Francis
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Ismail P.A et al vs Dr. Dhanush et al regarding dismissal for non-appearance
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Ismail P.A et al vs Dr. Dhanush et al regarding dismissal for non-appearance