Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 938/2022

Case between Mohammed Ismail P.A et al vs Dr. Dhanush et al regarding dismissal for non-appearance

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by Mohammed Ismail P.A and Mohammed Noor P.A, were involved in a suit against the defendants which included Dr. Dhanush and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of readiness for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's non-appearance and failure to present evidence. Costs were awarded against the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not ready to present evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mohammed Ismail P.A (44 years) Kandamangalath, Ponnekkara, Kochi - 41, Edappally Village Mohammed Noor P.A (41 years) Kandamangalath, Ponnekkara, Kochi – 41, Edappally Village

Defendants

Dr. Dhanush (45 years) Vettumannil House, Kizhcherrymelkarayil, Chenganoor Village, Chenganoor Taluk, Alappuzha District, PIN: 689 121 Swetha Jilson (40 years) Muttichukaran Veettil, Chembukavu, Chembukavu Village, Thrissur District, PIN : 680 005 Mohammed Yusuf P. A (49 years) Kandamangalath, Ponnekkara, Kochi - 41

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases