Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 833/2021

Case between Mohammed Azeem vs Mohammed Afsal et al regarding a civil suit.

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mohammed Azeem, filed a suit against the defendants, including Mohammed Afsal and others. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-filing of proof affidavit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation made by the plaintiff's side.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mohammed Azeem (57 years years) Defence Enclave, Feddalahalli, Hennur Main Road, Bengaluru

Defendants

Mohammed Afsal (50 years years) Village No. 16, MIR Green Metropolis, Emarald park, Mavelipuram, Kunnumpuram, Vazhakkala village, Kanayannoor taluk, Kakkanad P.O, Pin – 682 030, Ernakulam District. Mohammed Haneefa (73 years years) Valiyaveetil house, Kovilavattom Desom, Ernakulam village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Shanmugham Road P.O, Pin – 682 031, Ernakulam District, now residing at Thavakkal house, Hamzakunju Lane, SRM Road, Kaloor P.O, Pin – 682 018, Elamkulam village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District. State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Stressed Assets Recovery Branch, LMS Compound, Opposite Museum West Gate, Vikas Bhavan P.O, Pin – 695 033, Thiruvananthapuram District. The Manager, State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Secretariat View Branch, Cantonment Station Road, Palayam, Pin – 695 001, Thiruvananthapuram District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Defendant 1 to 3 absent represented. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases