Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 833/2021

Case between Mohammed Azeem vs Mohammed Afsal et al regarding a civil suit.

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mohammed Azeem, filed a suit against the defendants, including Mohammed Afsal and others. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-filing of proof affidavit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation made by the plaintiff's side.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation made by the plaintiff's side.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Azeem
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Afsal
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Haneefa
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Manager, State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Frijo K Sundaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hirusheekesan S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Solomon Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajesh Rajagopala Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Defendant 1 to 3 absent represented. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Azeem vs Mohammed Afsal et al regarding a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Azeem vs Mohammed Afsal et al regarding a civil suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won