Case Summary
The plaintiff Mohammed Ameen and the defendant Sameena Sethi were involved in this suit. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court to present evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present to present evidence. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is not present before the court to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohammed Ameen
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sameena Sethi
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Arun Kumar D.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Arun I. Sreedhar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Bilahari G.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is not present before the court to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020