Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 487/2023

Case between Mohammed Afsal vs Fathima Ashraf et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-10-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohammed Afsal is the plaintiff, while Fathima Ashraf and several others are defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation on the scheduled hearing date.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no proof affidavit was filed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear nor provide any representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mohammed Afsal (31 years years) Ullattil house, Kandamparambil house, Yuvakalatharangu Cross road, Elamakkara P.O, Pin – 682 026, Ernakulam.

Defendants

Fathima Ashraf (59 years years) Ullattil house, Kandamparambil House, Yuvakalatharangu Cross road, Elamakkara P.O, Pin – 682 026, Ernakulam. Abdul Rahiman O.A (42 years years) Ullattil house, Kandamparambil House, Yuvakalatharangu Cross road, Elamakkara P.O, Pin – 682 026, Ernakulam. Sumayya Althaf (39 years years) Chettuthara House, Near Chettuthara Juma Masjid, Kandakarna Temple road, Arookutty. Rabeeya Rafeeq (37 years years) Ullattil house, Kandamparambil House, Yuvakalatharangu Cross road, Elamakkara P.O, Pin – 682 026, Ernakulam. Shemeema Afsal (27 years years) Puthiyapurackal house, Near railway cross, Kumbalam, Ernakulam – 682 506.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases