O.S No. 487/2023

Case between Mohammed Afsal vs Fathima Ashraf et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court

COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Nanda Krishna M.

Order Date

2024-10-04

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohammed Afsal is the plaintiff, while Fathima Ashraf and several others are defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation on the scheduled hearing date.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no proof affidavit was filed.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear nor provide any representation.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear nor provide any representation.

Supporting Evidence

Still no representation from the side of plaintiff and no proof affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mohammed Afsal
Party Age: 31
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Fathima Ashraf
Party Age: 59
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Abdul Rahiman O.A
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sumayya Althaf
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rabeeya Rafeeq
Party Age: 37
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shemeema Afsal
Party Age: 27
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Fathima T.M
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.K.Sudheer
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Asha Ajith
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Muhammed Asif Ali
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The suit was dismissed for default.

Evidence: