Case Summary
M.M.TV Ltd is the plaintiff represented by its General Manager, Mr.T.J.Thankachan. The defendants include Ms.Pearle Maaney and companies represented by their Managing Directors. The case involved a compromise agreement that was accepted by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise submitted by both parties, which will form part of the decree. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was resolved through a mutually agreed compromise between the parties.
The case was resolved through a mutually agreed compromise between the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case was resolved through a mutually agreed compromise between the parties.
The case was resolved through a mutually agreed compromise between the parties.
Supporting Evidence
The case was resolved through a mutually agreed compromise between the parties.
Judgment Evidence:
Both sides represented. Compromise is filed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise which will form part of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.M.TV Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ms.Pearle Maaney
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asianet Communications Pvt Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Star India Private Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Millu Dandapani
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rameez Nooh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil S Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajani K.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Radhika Rajasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bilwin B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Peter
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sudheesh S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sajen Thampan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jennis Stephen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Karthika Maria
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Veena Raveendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Sebastian Pullickal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise which will form part of decree.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.M.TV Ltd vs Ms.Pearle Maaney et al regarding compromise
Case Code Year
Case between M.M.TV Ltd vs Ms.Pearle Maaney et al regarding compromise