Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 648/2018

Case between M.M.TV Ltd vs Ms.Pearle Maaney et al regarding compromise

Court
THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-01
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.M.TV Ltd is the plaintiff represented by its General Manager, Mr.T.J.Thankachan. The defendants include Ms.Pearle Maaney and companies represented by their Managing Directors. The case involved a compromise agreement that was accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise submitted by both parties, which will form part of the decree. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was resolved through a mutually agreed compromise between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Both sides represented. Compromise is filed. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise which will form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M.M.TV Ltd (Age not specified years) NH Bypass Road, Aroor P.O, Alappuzha – 685 34, Kerala, India

Defendants

Ms.Pearle Maaney (32 years years) Vadakkethala house, Thottumugham, Aluva, Kerala – 683 105 Asianet Communications Pvt Ltd (Age not specified years) Asianet complex, Puliyarakonam P.O, Trivandrum – 695 573 Star India Private Ltd (Age not specified years) Star House, Urmi Estate, 95, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Pael(West), Mumbai – 400 013

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise which will form part of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases