Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 335/2012

Case between M.M. Lisy vs Melemanakkat Aramughan et al regarding monetary claim

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2015-09-25
Duration
3 years 0 months 21 days
Case Code No.
335
Case Closed
Fri, 09/25/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Decree holder M.M. Lisy filed a petition seeking to withdraw an amount towards decree debt in OS 152/2000 from the sale proceeds, which was allowed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioner M.M. Lisy to withdraw Rs 58800 from the sale proceeds towards the decree debt in OS 152/2000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowing withdrawal of Rs 58800 towards decree debt
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner M.M. Lisy to withdraw Rs 58800 from the sale proceeds towards the decree debt in OS 152/2000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

EA 118/15 is allowed. Petitioner in EA 118/15 allowed to withdraw Rs 58800/- from the sale proceeds in this petition towards the decree debt in OS 152/2000. Issue sale certificate to the auction purchaser. Petition is closed

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.M. Lisy
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Melemanakkat Aramughan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Niranthala Unnikrishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ezhuthupurakkal Sudhakaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. Radhakrishnamenon
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Monetary Claim
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowing withdrawal of Rs 58800 towards decree debt
Evidence:
EA 118/15 is allowed. Petitioner in EA 118/15 allowed to withdraw Rs 58800/- from the sale proceeds in this petition towards the decree debt in OS 152/2000.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 09/04/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 09/25/2015 - 12:00
From
Tue, 09/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Wed, 09/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenivasan vs Ashraf regarding execution of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Chamaparambil Kari et al regarding enforcement of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Surendran et al regarding debt repayment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won