Case Summary
The case involves Minnie Antony as the plaintiff and M/s ITC Ltd as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the return of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court returned the plaint as the plaintiff was absent and not represented during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint is returned under Order 7 Rule 10 order in issue no 1 shall form part of the judgment.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Minnie Antony
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s ITC Ltd
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Denny Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Neena K.G
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.B.Unniraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gayathri Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Minnie Antony vs M/s ITC Ltd regarding return of plaint under Order 7 Rule 10
Case Code Year
Case between Minnie Antony vs M/s ITC Ltd regarding return of plaint under Order 7 Rule 10